For my fourth quarter blog project I
have chosen to report on the Iran-Contra Affair that plagued the
Reagan Administration in it's later years. In a nutshell the
Iran-Contra Affair was a covert arms deal between the United States,
Israel, Iran, and Nicaraguan “freedom fighters”, the Contras.
The United States, through Israel, was dealing arms to Iran, who was
subsequently dealing arms to the Contras in Nicaragua who were
fighting against a “Communist” Sandinista regime. Israel would
give Iran the weapons and the United States would reimburse the
Israelis. Another theory was that the United States was giving Iran
the weapons in exchange for hostages which is an unprecedented and
frowned-upon action. Throughout the ordeal Reagan insisted he was
unaware of the deals that were going on with the entire chain of arms
dealing.
As mentioned this ordeal took place
under the Reagan administration. Prior to the illegal actions the
Congress had passed a statement that made them illegal. Congress
stated that it was forbidden to deal with the Contras of Nicaragua.
Congress' statement did little to sway the actions of those who were
adamant about aiding the so called “freedom fighters”. They had
to try and aid them in a very roundabout way that would not have them
discovered to be helping them despite Congress' actions. The whole
ordeal brought a negative light upon the Reagan administration. The
American people thought badly of the affair because at first it
seemed as though the president was authorizing arms trade to a
violent, unstable Iran. Yet alone, that the president was going
against the orders of Congress who, in essence, symbolizes the
American people in the federal government.
One of the most memorable parts of the
entire affair would have to be council hearings regarding the key
players in the affair. When facts about the entire affair surfaced a
council of Congressman was assembled in order to review the ordeal
and to reach a verdict regarding the people involved and also to
discover who was involved. The hearings were streamed to the public
through the C-SPAN network so that the people could watch the case
and know its outcome.
One of the most recognizable of all
the key players is Lt. Col. Oliver North. North was a key player in
the arms for hostages actions between the United States and the
Iranians. North's testimony in the council hearings was one of the
most pivotal parts. North's testimony and questioning lasted for the
duration of a week. North is accused of shredding pertinent papers
regarding the affair and also for engaging in illegal actions with
other nations. During and after the trials the public had varying
views on Oliver North. Some people saw North as nothing more than a
traitor for supplying the Iranians with weapons, whereas some saw
North as a national hero for going against orders to try and help a
cause that he felt worthy of aid, the Contras. In the end North was
indicted. Lt. Col. North now works for Fox News.
Another recognizable figure in the
hearings is Fawn Hall. Hall was North's secretary who got dragged
into the affair for her position. She was accused of shredding
papers that were pertinent to the Iran-Contra affair. Hall testified
a month before North gave his bit. Hall was not charged of illegally
destroying National Security Council documents or obstructing
justice, she was given immunity. It would later become known that
Hall did assist in the destroying of documents and even in helping
North sneak documents out of his office in order to properly discard
of them. These actions, had they become apparent to the council
would definitely have sunken here case in the form of innocence.
Another of the key players in the
affair was member of the review council, Daniel Inouye. Inouye was a
Democratic Senator from Hawaii. Inouye was appointed to the
position by Senate Majority Leader Robert Byrd. Inouye had been a
member of the review council that presided over the Watergate Scandal
during Nixon's presidency. Inouye was known as a self-effacing man
and many thought that he would be over shadowed by the other council
members. Contrary to such beliefs Inouye became very active during
North's testimony. Inouye also delivered the councils closing
statement to North. He famously references the Nuremberg Trials
during his closing statement which sets North's lawyer to arguing
stating that it was a personal attack. Inouye delivered the verdict
of North being guilty of illegal actions and destroying NSC (National
Security Council) documents.
In the end, the council found North
guilty, Hall received immunity and Reagan was also found guilty of authorizing the actions of North. To this day no one knows exactly what all took place,
how many weapons were traded, how much of the stuff made its way to
Nicaragua, or who all was involved. This is mostly due to many of
the documentation of the events being destroyed. But despite this it
is well known that the Iran-Contra Affair was definitely not a bright
spot in the Reagan administration.
Sources:




